Discover Our Collections


  • Subject > Arms control and disarmament (remove)
  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Specific Item Type > Folder (remove)

11 results

  • bureaus, each headed by an Assistant Director. These are the International Relations Bureau, the Science and Technology Bureau, the Economics Bureau, and the Weapons Evaluation and Control Bureau. Supporting the Director, Deputy Director, and the four
  • and Technical Research. Long. Confidential. C. Research on Military Implications of Arms Control. By Evan T. Sage. Confidential. D. Political Research. E. Economic and Behavioral Science Research. By Alexander T. Liebowitz. Confidential. F. Legal
  • Research C. Research on Military Implications of Arms Control D. Political Research E. Economic and Behavioral Science Research F. Legal Research G. Field Tests Organization and Work of the Agency A. B. Administration and Structure 1. Planning
  • III. Research Program A. Organization and Management of Research B. Scientific and Technical Research C. Research on Military Implications of Arms Control D. Political Research E. Economic and Behavioral Science Research F. Legal Research G. Field
  • to light yesterday after the British science magazine Nature printed an article by three Finnish experts demonstrating beyond doubt that a Soviet test had raised radioactivity in the air over Finland last December. The Finns concluded
  • of Rhode Island. • • JU1 Sciences Council. Mr. Pell'• ~posal fl ""very t ;; . · , The Cabinet-level ·advisory constructive, he said.. but "'u ... . , ,. : . p-oup, which Mr. Humphrey of the moment we are not ready 41 Nations Consulted on heads. wu
  • that lime comes, the Bureau of Ynnls 111inNal w1mhhs the oceans offer. ils th,: l~J.,H (;rnu?,·a Convr.ntion, which an,I D,ll'ks fnow the Navnl Facilili,·s inlt!rn!lt in Ilic science of lh1: ~~ is ;!,\,·r n roa!ltnl !llntc the nnq,wstiom•cl Engineering
  • , Sidney Graybeal, ACDA Deputy Assistant Director for Science and Techno served In an advisory capacity to Ambassador Goldberg, p a r t i c i p a t e d In the day to day activities of the Outer Space L egal Subcommittee, and took part In some
  • the original parties (the United States, the United Kingdom, and the USSR) and other states selected on a rotating basis. The agreement would be monitored by national detection systems, but states could ^See Review of International Negotiations
  • would provide assurance that announced space objectives were in fact attempted. Unilateral detection systems have in the past been able to monitor long-range missile and space firings. In the future, missile or space flights which traverse distances