Discover Our Collections


  • Specific Item Type > Folder (remove)
  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Series > Files of Charles E. Johnson (remove)

28 results

  • WASHINGTON, D.C. 20550 July 17, 1967 MEMORANDUM Subject: Status of ANTON BRUUN As previously reported in the National Science Foundation press release, NSF 67-30, dated July 6, 1967, the floating drydock in which ANTON BRUUN was situated sunk on July 1st
  • States to •1t a terrible price to pay for a pack o! Mr. HOS:\!ER. l\ir. Speakrr, today we ·selectively proliferate purely defensive words v.·hich could be quite meaningless re-~~!\·ed a message from the t>-residc:nt nuclear armaments to hard-pressed U.S
  • by the U. S. and costly and politic~lly unpalatable aspects of raising adequate conventional forces, the NATO Allies have continuously pressed for more and more commitment of U. S. nuclear weapons to NATO in support of a NATO nuclear strategy in preference
  • countries or the United States. Detailed technical presentations were heard concerning each indi­ vidual Chinese Communist nuclear test and an assessment was made of future developments by Red China. in the field of nuclear weapons and associated delivery
  • grew. of cost program will not be taken now associated to policy its as about goals. opponents which they borrow without de Gaulle to disperse. is and prestige. ignorance of the force, the experience After it and statesmanship weapons
  • not that these space shots are associated with a FOB system in contrast to a possible re-entry development of the space system. Thirdly, where are they testing from? I'd rather not discuss that. It exposes some of our intelligence gathering information. Fourthly, does
  • , the statement to the press has transmitted the Agreement to Congress should be timed for morning release in Washington in order that releases in Europe can take advantage of the after­ noon press. by Mr. Reedy that the President It is my understanding from our
  • National Intelligence Estimate (SNIE) to study the technical capa­ bilities and incentives for the Soviet Union to deploy weapons and associated delivery systems on the seabed, and the corresponding capabilities of the U.S. to detect and identify
  • technical inconvenience. In political terms, on the other hand, the consequences of denial could be very serious. we do have an agreement, made in 1959 in good faith. we are already publicly associated with this particular program, by virtue of the agreement
  • . McGeorge Bundy No release to the press. E:--v-_J_~• ., - . ~ - \~1 lo ~~ - 5' ADELPHI PAPERS NUMBER :z: THIRTEEN = -= OCTOBER 1964 r--..., c...> :,.-; zrn . - C)
  • a feasibility study brought about by the French, British, and U.S. SSTpro­ posals being publicized in the Western press. By 1962 Soviet press articles car­ ried sketches of an SST obviously derived from the Bounder bomber prototype. Al­ though not an economical
  • of mounting pressure in Parliament to go nuclear, is not clear. Lower -Indian officials have been quoted in the press as believing that a nuclear explosive for "peaceful purposes" "'- would not vioiate India's formal commitment to Canada to use plutonium from
  • be prudent to continue the techniee.l i'rork now unde:r-.·:ay revision cf tt.1;:, cu1'".i-entembargo c:.efini­ 2.-:d to press in cooa1tor a realistic tion. With respect to the computer complex that Control D:1.t.e.Co:..1>oration proposed to ID..'Portto East
  • , was this fantastically powerful bomb detonated? The answer came in a terrifying revelation by famedmath­ ematician Dr. Donald G. Brennan, head of the Hudson Institute in Har­ mon-on-Hudson, N.Y., and associate of key atomic-physicistDr. Herman Kahn. Brennan said in part
  • rights: (1) To review the design of reactors (2) To require and pertinent associated facilities. of fuel and operating (3) the maintenance and submission to USGon demand records. To request periodic or special the facility. @NEI PENIW
  • enriched two year,. sive force of the fission triger. -tes Ma An Sdoaao, = ,,....., PRESERVATION cu.-Y PRESS RELEASE The UDlted Stat.a nuclear baa detected teat la the atmoapbere tu i8tb ol December uother Chine•• Comm-.mbt at taelr te•t
  • -80WOlEI _.ll)hidl _CHASE _COOPER AYNES n:: M f'_KLE,N I"> _j(CW_ - __a."tDY 5:::ilRs - N a:: ~ -;r~ Following publication of the John Finney article in the Paris edition of the NewYork Time·s on April 18, British press coverage of the subject
  • Intelligence, and the Special Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, With the Spec­ ial Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs as an adviser), consulting w1th the Press Sec­ retary to the President and the Director, USIA
  • powered Polaris submarine HMS RESOLUTIONis enclosed. This plan was pre­ pared with the assistance of United Kingdom representatives.· At the last minute the British asked that ·the press release scheduled for 5 January 1968 be delayed due to electrical
  • committee also decided to hold further negotiations before or during the 21st General Assembly. We will be pressing for early talks but recognize that the USSR has the capacity to delay negotiations and agreement. Benjamin H. Read Executive Secretary I I
  • SUBJEC:f1 SEABEDS REF, STATE 123899 I • SUMMARY I COUNCIL HAD I NF'ORMALI EXCHANGEON SEABEDS MARCH6, WITH DUTCH PRESSING FOR MiL1TARY tOMMITTEE CO ►lF I 9E ►IT I ♦ I., DECLASSIFIED E.O. 12958 Sec. 3.5 NLJ-S-SS001 By 1Qw' , NARA,Date6°'V~-Z.. Department
  • . If Soviets seem anxious t o press ahe ad with freezing text of res o l u t ion and collect ing t he other s ponsors , you are a u thorizen t o proceed ~ x x - s oones t ~ on the ba s is of t ex t se t forth below. You are also authorized t o j oin i n
  • •ON ·SPACE• USMIBA EXPRESSED MfS :OWN oiSTRESS AND APOLOGiES, PO i NT I NG OUT'rTHAT OF ·NECESS·t TY' MATTER 'HAO, TO BE' •D·t scuSSEo ;w i 'l'H· A NUMBER OF GOJ AGENC i ES AND I WELL! KNEW• AB H. i TY,OF'- JAP~NESE PRESS TO FERRET OUT.T-HESE MATTERS, (IP•3
  • pointed out before the UN in opeaking to the resolution, "if events as yet unforeseen suggest the need for acquaint a further look at th:ls matter, ... /the the United Nations ·.-rlth such eve-ats-:- 11~': thus 3ees no reason why any nation should press
  • HOMELASTEVENINGA NUMBER OF FRENCHMEN SPOKETO HIM ABOUTTHE PRESIDENTfSCo.NENTSAT PRESS CONFERENCE AND EXPRESSED CONSID£RAB~E BITTERNESSOVERWORDS HE USEDIN CONDEMNING FRENCHNUCLEAR PROGRAM.THE WORD"INIMICAL" UNFORTUNATELY HASA MUCHSTRONGER CONNOTATION IN FRENCH