Discover Our Collections
Limit your search
Tag- Digital item (6)
- 1967-10-03 (1)
- 1968-04-23 (1)
- 1968-09-09 (1)
- 1968-09-25 (1)
- 1968-11-11 (1)
- 1968-11-26 (1)
- Arms control and disarmament (6)
- Vietnam (6)
- Peace negotiations (5)
- 1968 transition (2)
- Czechoslovakia (2)
- Middle East (2)
- United Nations (2)
- Apartheid (1)
- China (1)
- Civil disobedience (1)
- Congressional relations (1)
- Draft (1)
- Nigeria (1)
- Public relations (1)
- USSR and Eastern Europe (1)
- Text (6)
- Meeting Notes (6)
- Folder (6)
- Meeting notes (6)
6 results
Folder, "September 25, 1968 - 12:17 p.m. National Security Council," Papers of Tom Johnson, Box 4
(Item)
- Ministers in New York at the beginning of the sessicn. There will be a full debate on disarmament issues, but we do not expect any major initiatives or significant achieveĀ ments. Discussion of Viet-Nam should be somewhat moderated by a desire to avoid
- to Vietienne was delivered. to Bunker has not be en. The message THE PRESIDENT: Somebody asked me how I read accurate accounts of what Hanoi is doing. I tell them I read leaks from the State Department in the New York Times. SECRETARY CLIFFORD: We may get
- : The Deputy Prime Minister wants 50 Phantoms right away. The new argument was that the Czech experience will encourage other actions in the Mid-East to take the spotlight off of Czechoslovakia. He said the Arbas will not begin to make peace until they know
- the New York State poll which shows strong Jewish support. Secretary Rusk: We still have a good deal of time to work out a formula on the Middle East. It is my feeling that we should put it in the Security Council rather than in the General Assembly. We do
- e he is personally involve d; for example, when Rusk was to talk at NATO about -the outlook of th e new administr a tion on NA TO. Replyin g to telegrams to Nix on. On the NPT, there was, in effect, solicitation of his support for Senate
- of a fellow Socialist Republic. We think it would be good for the President and Kosygin to meet. We want to know about the NPT coming back. 1. Would a new committee hearing be needed? 2. What kind of vote would you expect? 3. How much