Discover Our Collections


  • Specific Item Type > Folder (remove)
  • Series > Files of Charles E. Johnson (remove)
  • Tag > Digital item (remove)
  • Tag > new2024-Mar (remove)

25 results

  • SUCCESSOF THE NEW SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY,PARTICll..ARLY WITHRESPECTTO THE RECHUITIIENT OF Kl8H CALIBERPERSONNEL-• THE NEVATOM SMASHER.IS IN THE CHICAGO AREA, SEABORISAID, AND NECESSARILY WILL UTILIZE CHICAGO AIRPORTS• COLLE8£S·,,.ANP . INDUSTR·Y AS WELL
  • - ,.~Lrv) ID NOYember 1959, howeYel', after these new agreemat• for coopen.tlon had 1one Into effect, the Committee wu lnformallJ adriaed of a plaD whenbJ a U. S. nuclear weapon, the MB-1 (th6''Genie"air•to-air rocket) the nucleai- componBnt, would be mated
  • would take the place or arms." with blood. death, and rlara." Daily News on June 7, Jt63, respectively, Th.la Ls the official 1983 reafflrmatl n ot that Parley clearly 1ot forgiven his old concerning the ll!e a~ business career boee. September 1981
  • thing that now stands between them and final success is the daily quota of their Chancellor •s cigars. Mr. Chancellor, ~n welcoming you to these shores during our Christmas season, we are aware that we have much to be thankful for: a stable political
  • was very light. Attached are articles appearing April 19 in the Daily Telegraph and The Guardian, and also the Paris edition of the Herald Tribune. 7 The Guardian carried a press wire service dispatch :f'romParis stating that the French confirmed
  • placed ln orbi around th e RatheT, this resolution c lls for abstention. It would repreae t inte tional r cognit on that the a rac in oute sp ce at no be ex nded Lnto thi new nvir en that while a es eking w ye of l iting and rd cing ezieting P111U1nuants
  • power. are willing of money and somewhat reduced establishment, on their daily goes with of a home guard and a nuclear the enemy may advance While the French power successors not only that deterrence nuclear with and his point but also
  • with the included more than S108 million for whole new f'ntcrprise of sea Ooor en• r~a~ and engineering programs. p;inrering.'' Ten years ago the Navy was sending only one or two offirers a year for ul the Navy isn"t ti1inkinp; of ocran JlClSt•graduate oceanography
  • of the That Section 24 of the of America in Congress assembled, Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, is amended by adding a new sub­ section "d. d. as follows: an Assistant who shall General l-Bnager for Military be an active commissioned officer and who
  • . ' ,... f a.t I.= ft' !' ""'I _, -8feRET TO THE CONGRESS On May 16, 1964, Atomic Energy concurrence provide the Secretary Commission, for cooperation Atlantic a. and the Chairman a proposed in the exchange Organization to me, with the new
  • QUOTE1n the of our news in Genevao UNQUOTE lOo Para 13, second sentence. range would include with strategic in the freeze bomberse 11. Para 14. 12. Para 15, third primary mission 13. Also we have defined vehicles Delete last Add follo
  • this morning from New York. Ben~«~d~ Executive Secretary Enclosure: As stated. -COWFIDENTIAL ENCLOSURE * ., -~-~-.,.......,. ....... ---..----- .. ,.__ ,.,. t If• • -- ' • it . t ..•.... it .,._..i. CQNi!II>iNTJAJ FOR MOYERS.AT.TEXAS
  • ", Box 33] o~n Lt/l&/12 OS an9ram New Delhi A-9 70 c- ~ 4f~9f66 94 A'l8A'l9 G. .IORR68R &oReeten s 2 5~~88 05 memo Keeny to Rostow s 1 4/29/66 A Optn 'lbO/tSptt R,l'tC'11~ opU1 q/1'5/ll ijt;S oq-1&.1-e I\- i-7 ,fl,,. [Sanitized per
  • be leaving the meeting at 1100, we should tum to the heart of the problem, the MLF. Mr. Bates said he would like to discuss problem. this it 1n tact it still is a He said he had Just attended 111eetingsof the NATOParliamentarians in New York
  • the atudy of to ■peed tb1 ■ problem. the •tudy of tho Indian nuclea~ problem au Mid be wow.cl laaue a NSAM ahortly. PRESERVATION COPY ~/DRAFT June•• 1966 MEMORANDUM FOR THI: PR.E;IDENT We picked the Indian nucleu in your new ••ri••of meettaa
  • only 5% to 15% of the capability of this new machine. Therefore it seems to me our denial would be effective to forestall a significant contribution to French nuclear warhead and delivery capabilities. Accordingly, I would propose IBM not be authorized
  • Treaty, ln:;l.1!11tlonof thing which cnn be relied upan ·for U1e •. Absent this option natior,~ such as ,;~· •..··the ..hc,thnc-;· r..new Ontcr Spacr! Trcnty, heavy purpose of polichl% this treaty i.1 .Indln and Japan, !or e:,n.;nple. !acerl ,,,·ith
  • . Has not the French govemmer.: Commerce. There were C.T.V. news reports noUfled· Canada that it will not accept U:e over the week end which indicated that France principle of inspection; and is lt not a fac: had rejected Canadian control but that 1he
  • of gill Page2 LBJ LIBRARY DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL SHEET Doc# DocType Doc Info ,OSIG .Q'.ll "IAelex" Classification ~8·2--\~ Pages Date Restriction s 13 [e/661 A NL){y\•\~ 10b cable Deptel 2296 to New Delhi s 5 5/24/66 A 10e draft
  • lnformaUon. (B) Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the documenL (C) Closed In accordance with restrictions contained In the donor's deed at gift. ' j P' DD~sn~ I u , , l\Ilt.l lll,} JdU1 USP f • , • I • r ) TH~ NEW YORK TIMES
  • , New Menco ALBERT GORE, TennTHOMAS 0. MORRIS, New Mm.co HENRY M. JACKSON, Wuhlncton JOHN YOUNG, Tena BOURKE B. HIOKENLOOPER, Iowa ORAIO HOSMER, Califomla GEORGE D, ALKEN, Vennonl WILLIAM H. BATES, Muucbu11ettl WALLACE I'. BENNETT, Utah JOHN B. ANDERSON
  • be continuously evaluated in terms of both the potential end intention of the recipient country to engage in n mrtional program. 7. Mo new control mechanisms or formalized inter-llecncy committee:i i,ra required, but improved coorclinntion, cr.chnnna of views
  • be required. The Secretary has worked out an agreement wit:4 Minister von Hassel under which our Joint Chiefs will work with the FRG military authorities to make a new joint study of the potential military effectiveness of ADM 1 s. The Secretary 1 s • request
  • • we )lave ,-tten. Ual• ••• aot •w-ar to M the ca••• Tber.lore. 11111•••aomeou can ••tabUah tut tbl• lan•t ao. or that the Fr•adl p1aa to••• it on a new Muaa• W-1' da&t ba• •tnteatc: Y&bae. da•r• would •••m lo be little maAMI-W.l'laa ll'OUd I.or u here
  • ~tta.l'~iN: Vi~ .THE POLICY Of T_HE_UNITEDSTATtS.• -~)-~'--.1-_, . .'. . . . "1 WAS PRESENT AT THE .eACKGR()JNC)SR1tr1~ .r:uR NEW YORK: • M~N, NG T!--ilT NOT IN ACCORD\✓ I"'." ••• ,, . . \.'HtCHMR. RAYMONDc, ir __ AS THE SOURCE FOR HIS STORY