Discover Our Collections
Limit your search
Tag- Digital item (35)
- new2024-Mar (17)
- new2023-Oct (4)
- Joint Chiefs of Staff (4)
- Bundy, McGeorge, 1919-1996 (1)
- Johnson, Lyndon B. (Lyndon Baines), 1908-1973 (1)
- 1964-06-16 (2)
- 1964-12-17 (2)
- 1965-06-01 (2)
- 1966-04-22 (2)
- 1967-xx-xx (2)
- 1964-12-01 (1)
- 1966-xx-xx (1)
- Nuclear weapons (35)
- Arms control and disarmament (9)
- India (5)
- China (4)
- NATO (4)
- War games (4)
- France (2)
- Guided missiles (2)
- Pakistan (2)
- Western Europe (2)
- Defense (1)
- Germany (1)
- Text (35)
- Files of Charles E. Johnson (17)
- National Security Action Memorandums (8)
- Agency Files (4)
- Committee Files (4)
- Country Files (1)
- National Security Council Meetings Files (1)
- Folder (33)
- Memorandum (2)
- Meeting notes (1)
35 results
Folder, "NUCLEAR - Nuclear Detonation - CHICOM Bomb," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 36
(Item)
- SUCCESSOF THE NEW SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY,PARTICll..ARLY WITHRESPECTTO THE RECHUITIIENT OF Kl8H CALIBERPERSONNEL-• THE NEVATOM SMASHER.IS IN THE CHICAGO AREA, SEABORISAID, AND NECESSARILY WILL UTILIZE CHICAGO AIRPORTS• COLLE8£S·,,.ANP . INDUSTR·Y AS WELL
- - ,.~Lrv) ID NOYember 1959, howeYel', after these new agreemat• for coopen.tlon had 1one Into effect, the Committee wu lnformallJ adriaed of a plaD whenbJ a U. S. nuclear weapon, the MB-1 (th6''Genie"air•to-air rocket) the nucleai- componBnt, would be mated
- their resolutionJ and c) to define the membership, locus and terms of reference for a new Working Group or reconstituted Paris Working Group to continue the multilateral d1acusaion1. An under11tanding 1n advance of thia somewhat l.im1ted 1et of objectives would
- was very light. Attached are articles appearing April 19 in the Daily Telegraph and The Guardian, and also the Paris edition of the Herald Tribune. 7 The Guardian carried a press wire service dispatch :f'romParis stating that the French confirmed
- , hardened Work con- and elements in the During the summer of 1968, hard-line Soviet Politburo accelerated development of MIRVs, depressed • • orbit ICBMs, Communist China came under new leadership with the death of Mao. Managers and technicians assumed
- power. are willing of money and somewhat reduced establishment, on their daily goes with of a home guard and a nuclear the enemy may advance While the French power successors not only that deterrence nuclear with and his point but also
- or military areas. e. A Control Team examines the "Move Message" which each team provides and determines the positions of other countries and influences. A scenario projection is then prepared which advances the situation to a new point in time and requires
- authority capable of making the decision to use nuclear weapons, the United States recognizes that this will create a new situation in which reconsideration of various provisions of.the charter would be appropriate. In any event, revision of the charter
- of the That Section 24 of the of America in Congress assembled, Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, is amended by adding a new sub section "d. d. as follows: an Assistant who shall General l-Bnager for Military be an active commissioned officer and who
- that the next and succeeding dispersal plans focus princi ally on changes of this sort as far and that any recommendation for significant net increases in the stockpile beyond the level authorized by this NSAM wili be made only on the basis of new circum
Folder, "A Way of Thinking about Nuclear Proliferation (Rostow)," Committee Files, NSF, Box 1
(Item)
- and rather here and there measures various and weight preventing influencing concerned of shaping new nations their thought is the or proposals an all-environment to apply a little as with and mounting the components the course from entering
- . The 13 detections of 18 night launches detected by 440L comes out to only 70%. 2o @perational Readiness. The Feb ruary readiness date for the interim detection system is a new target date for initial operational capability. As of 1 November we were
- QUOTE1n the of our news in Genevao UNQUOTE lOo Para 13, second sentence. range would include with strategic in the freeze bomberse 11. Para 14. 12. Para 15, third primary mission 13. Also we have defined vehicles Delete last Add follo
- recommendation for significant net increases in the stockpile beyond the level authorized by this NSAM will be made only on the basis of new circum stances. in.f" ....--- -t\~ -McGeor ge Bundy UMClASS!FIED "'FOP eE ffR:l!i'i' Il:1!13T '.Pt?CY !!1' :B A'l
- MEMORANDUM FOR MR. BUNDY SUBJECT: Nuclear Weapons Dispersal Plan for FY 1964 Although this FY 1964 Dispersal Plan is only good through .June 3 0, and a new FY 1965 paper is now under development, we still need Presidential approval of the 1964 Plan to satisfy
Folder, "Problem of Nuclear Proliferation Outside Europe (Murray)," Committee Files, NSF, Box 1
(Item)
- at Hiroshima, are readily available and it would require only a few years for a new nuclear power to weapon ize a bomb to fit. Moreover, missiles may in time become cheaper and more readily available: through the satellite programs or surface to-air missile
Folder, "NSAM # 345: Nuclear Planning, 4/22/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 8
(Item)
- might also say that you understand the work on nuclear sharing is going very well and that you look forward to receiving the results, as well as the suggestions for construc tive new departures in NATO and vis-a-vis the East.) There are three
- an arms control agreement between the Soviet Union and the United States. 9. How to reassure the US public and allies that deterrent posture is not impaired by the development Soviet and CHICOMstrategic capabilities. 10. antees Nlpahj the US of new How
- ", Box 33] o~n Lt/l&/12 OS an9ram New Delhi A-9 70 c- ~ 4f~9f66 94 A'l8A'l9 G. .IORR68R &oReeten s 2 5~~88 05 memo Keeny to Rostow s 1 4/29/66 A Optn 'lbO/tSptt R,l'tC'11~ opU1 q/1'5/ll ijt;S oq-1&.1-e I\- i-7 ,fl,,. [Sanitized per
Folder, "NUCLEAR - Indian Nuclear Problem [2 of 2]," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 33
(Item)
- the atudy of to ■peed tb1 ■ problem. the •tudy of tho Indian nuclea~ problem au Mid be wow.cl laaue a NSAM ahortly. PRESERVATION COPY ~/DRAFT June•• 1966 MEMORANDUM FOR THI: PR.E;IDENT We picked the Indian nucleu in your new ••ri••of meettaa
- only 5% to 15% of the capability of this new machine. Therefore it seems to me our denial would be effective to forestall a significant contribution to French nuclear warhead and delivery capabilities. Accordingly, I would propose IBM not be authorized
- in anticipation of eventual Presidential approval of the new guidance. Bennewitz in Defense also told me yesterday that they were hoping the NSAM could be issued shortly because the new guidance will have considerable impact on our approach to stockpiling. I think
Folder, "NSAM # 345: Nuclear Planning, 4/22/1966," National Security Action Memorandums, NSF, Box 8
(Item)
- themselves not to launch new na.tional nuclear programs. Three alternative forms which that force might take are set forth below, beginning with assignment and progressing toward joint ownership of delivery _s ystems and warheads. . 1) · 1
- Treaty, ln:;l.1!11tlonof thing which cnn be relied upan ·for U1e •. Absent this option natior,~ such as ,;~· •..··the ..hc,thnc-;· r..new Ontcr Spacr! Trcnty, heavy purpose of polichl% this treaty i.1 .Indln and Japan, !or e:,n.;nple. !acerl ,,,·ith
Folder, "NUCLEAR - French Purchase of Canadian Uranium," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 32
(Item)
- . Has not the French govemmer.: Commerce. There were C.T.V. news reports noUfled· Canada that it will not accept U:e over the week end which indicated that France principle of inspection; and is lt not a fac: had rejected Canadian control but that 1he
Folder, "NUCLEAR - Indian Nuclear Problem [1 of 2]," Files of Charles E. Johnson, NSF, Box 33
(Item)
- of gill Page2 LBJ LIBRARY DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL SHEET Doc# DocType Doc Info ,OSIG .Q'.ll "IAelex" Classification ~8·2--\~ Pages Date Restriction s 13 [e/661 A NL){y\•\~ 10b cable Deptel 2296 to New Delhi s 5 5/24/66 A 10e draft
- . Concurrent _CPRattacks in the NEFAand Kashmir pushed the Indians back to Chinese claimed borders as Peiping issued veiled nuclear warnings to New Delhi. Responding to Government of India (GOI) requests, the US expedited the flow of economic and military
- .1 consideration was given to pene~tiori of an ICBM defense. A "new" or "secom generation" of var.heads i s now being develo.Ped with the prt:nary objective of enhancing our penetration capability. Duril:lg mLICK, de s1gn features which
- , New Menco ALBERT GORE, TennTHOMAS 0. MORRIS, New Mm.co HENRY M. JACKSON, Wuhlncton JOHN YOUNG, Tena BOURKE B. HIOKENLOOPER, Iowa ORAIO HOSMER, Califomla GEORGE D, ALKEN, Vennonl WILLIAM H. BATES, Muucbu11ettl WALLACE I'. BENNETT, Utah JOHN B. ANDERSON
- be continuously evaluated in terms of both the potential end intention of the recipient country to engage in n mrtional program. 7. Mo new control mechanisms or formalized inter-llecncy committee:i i,ra required, but improved coorclinntion, cr.chnnna of views
- be required. The Secretary has worked out an agreement wit:4 Minister von Hassel under which our Joint Chiefs will work with the FRG military authorities to make a new joint study of the potential military effectiveness of ADM 1 s. The Secretary 1 s • request
- the and official does represent expansion; of be overemphasized. role for the main barrier, would take on a new perspective the creation regarding cannot limited 11 political to any significant and the use of nuclear symbols of nationalism
- to explore questions some of the fundamental and iuvolved. from ~hose intereeted We are requesting conaents in ACDAand in the State ~partment. However, because of the immediate concern with the subject in New York,, I thought you might be interested
- • we )lave ,-tten. Ual• ••• aot •w-ar to M the ca••• Tber.lore. 11111•••aomeou can ••tabUah tut tbl• lan•t ao. or that the Fr•adl p1aa to••• it on a new Muaa• W-1' da&t ba• •tnteatc: Y&bae. da•r• would •••m lo be little maAMI-W.l'laa ll'OUd I.or u here
- ~tta.l'~iN: Vi~ .THE POLICY Of T_HE_UNITEDSTATtS.• -~)-~'--.1-_, . .'. . . . "1 WAS PRESENT AT THE .eACKGR()JNC)SR1tr1~ .r:uR NEW YORK: • M~N, NG T!--ilT NOT IN ACCORD\✓ I"'." ••• ,, . . \.'HtCHMR. RAYMONDc, ir __ AS THE SOURCE FOR HIS STORY