Skip to main content
Limit your search
Tag
Contributor
Date
Subject
Type
Collection
Series
Specific Item Type
Time Period
7 results
- MAP levels
with either country. Until we·have a clearer idea of the prospects
for the FY 1965 aid program~ it seems to me premature to
indicate to India or Pakistan how much military aid they might be
able to count upon, regardless of how tentatively
- Foreign aid
-
.
•t •
....
3. lloth. st;>vtiiA.mo.i. rnlJ•t be n\&4e *° \lnde~•tancl tlU>.t no
11'•:avooab1• 4•• vtar MAP ·co~•ni. can k on«er~en
\ly the- 0#1: both ~•u••· '46 iovel• -..ch year will lhpen4 ....·.
QD Qlnar•t• -d \)ee&us• ouir ~ aid ·• ch 1
- Foreign aid
- not want us to discuss MAP levels yet with eithe r country.
11
- 2.
We were to 11 make clear to both countries what we expect of them in
return for prospective long - term military aid. " You singled out for
India holding down defense expenditures
-
assistance.
It countered the ChiCom threat by deploy
ing US air defense, fighter aircraft
and air transport
units to India and a nuclear capable naval task force
into the Bay of Bengal.
The Kremlin continued military and economic aid
at current levels
- made to Ambassador Ahmed .
In all
c andor , your recommendations r egarding our aid to India and your
al t ernatives do not appear t o me to be.in our nationa l interest nor
yours .
I am sure you will agr ee with me that we need to come to some
be t
- Bundy ...
Policy Team
• • • • •
.• ..
......
. . .
.
..
White House
LGen David A. Burchinal
• • • •
JCS
Mr. William S. Gaud
• • •
AID
LGen Andrew J. Goodpaster,
USA. •
General Harold K. Johnson,
USA. •
Hon.
u
- SHEET (PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARIES)
FORM OF
DOCUMENT
fl28A--Memo-
CORRESPONDENTS OR TITLE
eefl t- ~ ;yz J 81-70
~,_,..,
, ...,
' ' -Clr -01
pt esident from Davia w=Tl
oe.1.
-r
AID
t&
DATE
RESTR ICTION
in9/65
-~-;~--+-""""~~
_ff_H