Discover Our Collections


  • Collection > National Security Files (remove)
  • Type > Text (remove)
  • Subject > India (remove)
  • Subject > Pakistan (remove)

7 results

  • MAP levels with either country. Until we·have a clearer idea of the prospects for the FY 1965 aid program~ it seems to me premature to indicate to India or Pakistan how much military aid they might be able to count upon, regardless of how tentatively
  • Foreign aid
  • . •t • .... 3. lloth. st;>vtiiA.mo.i. rnlJ•t be n\&4e *° \lnde~•tancl tlU>.t no 11'•:avooab1• 4•• vtar MAP ·co~•ni. can k on«er~en \ly the- 0#1: both ~•u••· '46 iovel• -..ch year will lhpen4 ....·. QD Qlnar•t• -d \)ee&us• ouir ~ aid ·• ch 1
  • Foreign aid
  • not want us to discuss MAP levels yet with eithe r country. 11 - 2. ­ We were to 11 make clear to both countries what we expect of them in return for prospective long - term military aid. " You singled out for India holding down defense expenditures
  • assistance. It countered the ChiCom threat by deploy­ ing US air defense, fighter aircraft and air transport units to India and a nuclear capable naval task force into the Bay of Bengal. The Kremlin continued military and economic aid at current levels
  • made to Ambassador Ahmed . In all c andor , your recommendations r egarding our aid to India and your al t ernatives do not appear t o me to be.in our nationa l interest nor yours . I am sure you will agr ee with me that we need to come to some be t
  • Bundy ... Policy Team • • • • • .• .. ...... . . . . .. White House LGen David A. Burchinal • • • • JCS Mr. William S. Gaud • • • AID LGen Andrew J. Goodpaster, USA. • General Harold K. Johnson, USA. • Hon. u
  • SHEET (PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARIES) FORM OF DOCUMENT fl28A--Memo- CORRESPONDENTS OR TITLE eefl t- ~ ;yz J 81-70 ~,_,.., , ..., ' ' -Clr -01 pt esident from Davia w=Tl oe.1. -r AID t& DATE RESTR ICTION in9/65 -~-;~--+-""""~~ _ff_H