Discover Our Collections


  • Collection > National Security Files (remove)
  • Type > Text (remove)
  • Specific Item Type > Folder (remove)
  • Subject > India (remove)

48 results

  • developed by "action level" teams. The exact format of each game varies according to the special requirements that may be posed, but in general, FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY A-1 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY these are "desk" or "manual" type games in which teams meet
  • . Rostow, White House Staff, dated , June 11, 1968 1 stated th~t plans were being made to · trans­ fe:rr ANTON BRUUN to GSA for disposal. Prior to taking. this action, the State Department and the Marine Science Council , Staff were formally asked
  • of action is not likely to prove successful. The attendance at this meeting will be much more limited than at the last Senior Review. They are presently saving a place ~for ~ Authority By~'_., you. DECLASSIFIED '-.) %5"-tt/-3 N~ l ' • . H-1~D
  • suggests that you might wish to advise the President of this action. I recommend that we wait to see what replies he gets from State and the Marine Sciences Council before saying anything more to the Pres.ident in this matter. I attach Haworth's memorandum
  • of the matter is that we seem. to be achieving an agricultural revolution in. India. In part, of course, this is attributable to India'• own dawn­ ing r~alization of past foWes, but our action on PL 480 was unquestionably a major catalyst. Note the attached
  • repairs to the ship to place her in pre-casualty con­ dition. When this point is reached, there will be material and legal questions which must be negotiated and solved be­ fore we can determine what future course of action we will takeo At the time
  • try to bring Ayub around , s eeking to avoid any action which might cause him to think he was being forced to the brink. I The President wondered how much we unounts of aid we were giving to India nuch our aid to Pakistan was runni n · ; ~ .l..!1
  • was already meeting on Kashmir , State felt any r eply should be delayed for a. few days . There is no indication in NSC files that further action was t aken. - 5 . This collection of documents from Febr uary, March a nd April show the effort to reevaluate