Skip to main content
-
Collection >
National Security Files
(remove)
-
Subject >
Defense
(remove)
-
Type >
Text
(remove)
Limit your search
Tag
Contributor
Date
Subject
Type
Collection
Series
Specific Item Type
Time Period
17 results
-
latereate ud cooc•ru of the new Brltllb ·G °"9rameat. k la·
alto olwi•a t»t •• •UU laaw ·t o take·careful accoaat of tla9
latereata u4 f'U'Pff•• ot France.
2. Ou owa lld4lre1t b, •• It baa beea. to flr&a the moat etf•c:·
d• meau of ad.vaaclaa ·t h• partner
-
I have reviewed your 22 October 1965 Memorandum to
me in response to NSAM 337 as updated by the Department
of State 1 s 17 May 1966 Memorandum to Mr. Rostow and
by my approval on 23 May of the new military· sales package
for Iran.
I approve your
-
SUBJECT:
Alternatives to US Facilities in Pakistan
I have reviewed your 22 October 1965 Memorandum to
me in response to NSAM 337 as updated by the Department
of State's 17 May 1966 Memorandum to Mr. Rostow and
by my approval on 23 May of the new
- '
1. In the next months we face highly important negotiations
and decisions, on this subject. These decisions relate not only
to the MLF 'proposals now under discussion in Paris, but to the
interests and concerns of the new British Government
-
SUBJECT: Dispersal Plan for NORAD Air Defense
Squadro.ns
The President believes that any proposal for dispersal 0£
US air defense aircraft and associated nuclear weap.ons to
Canadian bases will be one which the new Government of Canada.
will not consider
- • done, but l do think that.
glven the toxt ot. tbl NSAM aud the tact of a. new Preeldent
we ought all to he vu, cue£ul about dlacuea1111 fu.rthe.r
withdrawal• with uy loretper• at thl• ti.me.
1 do not regard ltd.• as a lcwmal mem.o ral\dum f:rom
- be leaving the meeting at 1100, we should
tum to the heart of the problem, the MLF.
Mr. Bates said he would like to discuss
problem.
this it 1n tact
it still
is a
He said he had Just attended 111eetingsof the NATOParliamentarians
in New York
- in anticipation of eventual Presidential approval of
the new guidance. Bennewitz in Defense also told me yesterday that they
were hoping the NSAM could be issued shortly because the new guidance
will have considerable impact on our approach to stockpiling. I think
- ) has reviewed the existing policy guidance
on this subject, i.e., NSC 6o19/1 and recommends that it be
continued in its entirety in the new NSAM. Hence, the
"attached directive" referred to in the enclosed draft NSAM
should be identical with NSC 6o19/1
- , 27 November
1968, in the New State Department Building. In attendance
were:
STATE
- Mi. Howard Furnas, Chairman
OSD/ISA
- Miss Buckley
OJCS
- Col M. L. Parsons, USA, J-5
- Col F. H. Riggs, USAF, J-5
AID
- Mn. Bell
- Mr. Goin
- Miss Hughes
- that new facilities were constructed, the Forward Floatin~
Depot augmented, or the Korean economy compensated for the U.S.
withdrawal.
State Department Views
My own view is that the proposed redeployment would not be in
U.S. interest at this time
- the Kenya government was granted
and the mbassy given discretionary authority to in
form the Kenya government March 31.
9.
e have told our mbassies in Karachi and
New Delhi that the Pakistan and Indian governments
should be informed of our plans after April
- Chile plus Peru and/or Ecuador are denied.
i. Establish two new stations, one in Hawaii, and one in
either Fiji Islands or American Samoa. A mobile
station for special equatorial coverage would possibly
be required.
2. Cost:
Approximately
$14.ooo
- .
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
NA FORM 1429 (6-85)
NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL
GO~TFIDEPf'FIAis
22 October 1964
MEMORANDUM FOR GENERAL CLIFTON
As I mentioned this morning I have drafted
a new NSAM on exercises in which I have tried
- the potential and intention of the recipient
country to engage in a national program.
No new control mechanisms or formalized inter-agency
committees are required, but improved coordination, exchange
of views and centralized compilation of case-by-case
- ~
Assume. Chile plus Peru .a nd/or ·Ecuador are denied.
~.
Establish two new stations, .one in Hawaii, and one in
either Fiji Isl.8.nds or .ADieri9an .Samoa. · ·A. mob-ile .
station for' spe_c ial equatorial ·coverage ·.would possibly
· be required.
·
2
-
ns~uro
Cu.~•s rolatio~a
of
vith the
new Soviet Co•.;ornmcnt. it appeal"s probAble, on balaneo. that tho USSR v111 Set.ik
1.
us
Alt .:l'"?':-tti~es,
a.
contlngc~
th!$
Th~ir
pl:uming ca.lb for a
a S?:.ont-i>«"ntn.
~t
pTos~atl1
th.at tho
