Skip to main content

Discover Our Collections

16 results

Folder, "McGeorge Bundy, Vol. 12, July, 1965 [2 of 2]," Memos to the President, NSF, Box 4 (Item)

Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 4, Tabs 258-280," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 41 (Item)

Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 5, Tabs 326-340," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 42 (Item)

theater in World War II — it was in our deepest national interest to provide that help. Three events in the immediate post-war period set the stage for the type of problems we have been wrestling with in Asia, in a steady ssd COPY LBJ LIBRARY -3and

Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 5, Tabs 314-325," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 42 (Item)

DISSOLUTION THAT GOVERNMENT. HOLDOVERS; AM VAN do who held IN FOREIGN a f f a i r s POST, KY CHOSE TO RETAIN TP 4 »\ riU Same p o r t f o l io i n . f i r s t diem government and, in QUAT GOVERNMENT DO should f u r n i s h u s e f u l c o n t i n u i t y , e x

Folder, "McGeorge Bundy, Vol. 12, July, 1965 [1 of 2]," Memos to the President, NSF, Box 4 (Item)

Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 5, Tabs 293-313," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 42 (Item)

Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 1, Tabs 1-10," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 40 (Item)

Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 5, Tabs 281-292," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 42 (Item)

: r D o f 0 6 S ta te I COLLECT CHARGE TO UNCLASSIFIED 85 O rig in P ACTION- CIRGUtAR (ALL A2IERIC.\!i DIPLOMATIC POSTS ^ POIADS, A>^D USU:^ NEW YORK) G H AF ARA EUR FE NEA 10 ^ JS IA INR DOD b^?pre5 f e io SS F o llo w in g e x c e

Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 2, Tabs 61-87," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 40 (Item)

Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 2, Tabs 120-140," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 41 (Item)

WITHIN BACKGROUNDERS, FUNDAr-]ENTAL MOST 0? THE I AM FIRST TO CONFESS THAT OUR PRESENT PRESS POLICY IS NOT DOING WELL AND NEEDS IMPROVEMENT, MY ATTENTION HAS JUST BEEN CALLED TO STANLEY XARNOW ARTICLE IN THE SATURDAY EVENING POST "VIET-NAM WHERE DO WE GO

Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 3, Tabs 141-169," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 41 (Item)

Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 3, Tabs 200-220," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 41 (Item)

s a re bound up w it h t h e USSR's p o s i t i o n i n t h e Communist world and i n t h e u n derdeveloped a r e a s , th e post-K hrushchev le a d e r s h i p f e e l s com pelled t o a c t , even i n t h e f a c e o f r i s k s which Khrushchev

Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 4, Tabs 242-257," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 41 (Item)

ARE ABOUT 1 TO be HADE. HE HOPES TO HAVE CABINET MEETING TODAY WITH CHIEF OF STATE SUU PRESEOT AND TO BE ABLE TO ANNOUNCE CHANGES SHORTLY , thereafter , HE SAID THAT ALL ARRANGEMENTS WERE FIRM EXCEPT FOR ■ FILLING OF ONE POST BUT DID NOT VOLUNTEER FURTHER

Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 6, Tabs 357-383," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 43 (Item)

EC EN TLY REQ UIRED T A X I D R IV ER S TO ACCEPT ANY PASSENGERS OR TO POST ” NOT FOR H IR E " SIG NS WHEN OFF D U TY , SIN C E SOME D R IV E R S PASSED UP VIETN A M ESE PASSENGERS IN ORDER TO F IN D MORE ^GENEROUS T I P S FROM AM ERICANS.' TH E

Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 1, Tabs 42-60," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 40 (Item)

Folder, "Deployment of Major U.S. Forces to Vietnam, July 1965, Volume 6, Tabs 384-400," National Security Council Histories, NSF, Box 43 (Item)

FOR NOMINATIONS. WE SUGGESTED TH A T HE LOOK O U TS ID E " P O L IT IC IA N S " TO OTHER MEN NOW IN P R IV A TE L I F E AND SUGGESTED THAT HE CONSIDER TRAN VAN CH-UONG FOR SOME POST I F TH E R E WERE NO P O L IT IC A L O BJEC TIO N S. HE IN D IC A TED THAT HE D ID