Discover Our Collections


  • Collection > Meeting Notes Files (remove)
  • Type > Text (remove)
  • Subject > Vietnam (remove)
  • Specific Item Type > Folder (remove)

61 results

  • ~e •' .' r1!cNama:::-a : t0 a Our llili tar,r ac tion approach i s an unac ceptable Nay 3u;ce3~ful ~ J~c l us ion~. 3:all: ::a:::: le? J'l!C_~.9.:ln. ra: ... ii ~~1t • rfli ,: Geer: .J U c i1 t,1...::-:.1.ll C ti on . i ~0 ...."lG ~O :J .:J".l
  • , you need to get from Westmoreland his plan for using our resources and what results - - what happens July - - and next January. What is estimate of NVN response? 1!1 :..J~ t..K 'iI Rusk, give much thought to this 'Fhi! witl be subjected to immense
  • solution. No one predicted speedy end. Aggression can be def eated, subversion could be stopp·~d~ social revolution can be started. Difficult to talk o f victory in this country. I we n t as res ca:r c!ier, not as advocate. Ii we do:-i 1 t bette r Som
  • .. •\lie.a eacit time. - - - - - - -- -5­ .ACHESON - ..' J'irat. we P"t into effect a plaa to 1treqUaea ta• Viet Nam 1ovel'am•11t. Tur aaaow.c• th• plaa. We Ii"• th• oiher aid• two we•ka to cbiO it over. .For cwo wee.lo we Will take a o oifeaei
  • . Oceanography ... We are developing a possible US proposal wh~ch would call for: (i) GA establishment of a Committee on the Oceans similar to the Outer Space Committee; (ii) an outline for a Declaration of Legal Principles to Govern the Activities on the Ocean
  • and II and tre Korean War concerning the information problem. He pointed out that we have not dealt with censorship at all. "Perhaps we should send three good editors out there to take a look at the situation and make some recommendations on how we can
  • received no word from him, we asked our Ambassador to press him for some kind of report Finally Kosygin said "You are sti II bombing and nothing can be done. 11 Thus he slammed t~e door on us. We believe that he talked to North Vietnam and they told him
  • those who have been there say anything about it. This was quite contrary to what took place in World War II. He said he had to be careful not to get the country on an anti-communist binge because it tears up what we have gained with the USSR (Consular
  • the Suharto government forward to stability and success. II. You might then ask Under Secretary Katzenbach to review briefly what has been accomplished since our last NSC meeting a year ago (see Tab B for State paper on top of which is a summary we have
  • 14th. j. II i They will start talking the Mansifeld report on ..._ c..~ I' I Authority -­ N By I t.. .J 8 ~- ~I ' •:.-.....:: '. , ~ ,t,e ID ·b: k' 3 1/10/66 -2­ What better way do we have to tell our story except through
  • January 22, 1966 Canada for pause. Thailand doesn't want U.S. to show weakness. France push pause for three months. Bloc countries need time, they say. Latin Americans support pause longer ii military situation permits. Indians talk about initiative
  • , but not overnight, on the confidence of the North Vietnamese troops. We learned in World War II that we should step up pressure when the enemy shows signs of weakness. USIA Director lv!arks: We should not decide this question on the basis of world opinion
  • ·~~~~ ·~ . ·. , · · ·::.~7:;'. :p1;, ;.~~~'. · .\~:~!~ ~f :~.'.f:~:~_'..;·.·/:.~~~~}~iI',:· A~i(~~~:~'-;._:~~:.~mt~tt.~}~;~~~~~ :•..-:g: .: . panta!~descrlbitv]whatfabemqdone·b;r~:hi::other::~ings::and· ~•~,~~~.~•.';:'1 .:: . ·~~:::.~~ ;~y:;::_>Lj~~ ~~·-~·:!,:.~'\~: ·: ~f
  • have been well served in this respect by Amb. Waller who waa good enough to jotn· us. II you have probleme, let him know; he has the key to the front door and the back door of the Whlte House. As for Ed and Ann Clark, I have been worried that he wae
  • ;;er.t:~-::· ·.:''···! ~!. - •• -----------~-/- i._1_, _Q_; _-~-~-!1. fr1.-- .. iI !·-·- ---­ l -~L-~-- -~ - ~~~- ~fl _ ~- iA.. _.~ _hJ,,~ ·?'"'· >'
  • destroyed cities like we did Dresden in World War II. Of course we have killed some civilians, but we have tried to carry on the most selective careful effort to deprive the enemy of the substance of his aggression without waging war on civilians. "I1 ve
  • Council than at the leadership meeting. .... Walter .. ' ' SEP.VI . ··~ ' I ,, .. '. .. t: - r; .• ·"1 •t • r: ' ' . ., I• " ., .. -.;. }; '-·.. ''-- :..J• •• !~ i· ~ . ii. •j ~ yr: SUMMARY OF LEADERSHIP MEETING AUGUST 4, 1964
  • :! i. The Political and Economic Situation -- Key Issues as Seen from Saigon: Ambassador Lodge 3. Key Political Issues: i ..... I ·1 :i Secretar1: :Rusk ' I I' ' •.I '. i I I II 4. Key Military Issues: Secretary McNamara S. Key
  • :) ':?. J'r-~ pn r~ ~. Ccw11!1~nn111·~t" b11i.J•l.i.ng in :i.ir nnd r:l~p up air ntf.nckn
  • it was a wea~{ government and would be while t:ie VC were free to attack it district by district. About t:-iis point the·'President told the Lcz.dersnip why he did not call the Leadership earlier (the notes say that this statement was ":per my memo to him
  • quoted General Larson 1 s Report for II Corps and Westrnoreland 1 s cable of August 11. He said General Johnson had visited every area in the country and was most optimistic. Roberts raised the question of a confrontation with China. The President